Quant Risk Analysis — 01 APR 2026

Personal Geopolitical Risk Model

Scenario analysis • Probability distributions • Trigger events
Translation: Even though the most likely outcome is benign, the probability-weighted risk score of reflects the asymmetric impact of tail scenarios. A 10% chance of catastrophic personal harm (detention, exit ban) dominates the expected value calculation — similar to how a portfolio with 90% bonds and 10% in distressed assets has risk characteristics defined by the 10%, not the 90%.
Composite: — "Elevated trending Serious"
WITHOUT CARD
58
risk index
WITH CARD
71
risk index
+13 pts (+22% increase)
Biometrics in PSB database + mainland jurisdiction exposure + degraded consular protection
Bubble size = impact magnitude • Green = de-escalatory
Strait reopens — single biggest de-risking event. Oil drops below $90, global pressure eases, US attention returns to Indo-Pacific. 45% probability in 1-3mo

Iran ceasefire — removes the catalyst for "US distraction" theory. China loses its window argument. Taiwan pressure likely decreases. 35% probability in 2-6mo

Trump-Xi summit success — trade truce holds, no Taiwan provocations, rare earth exports resume. The "managed competition" scenario. 40% probability late Apr/May
Projected personal risk index vs. average US expat baseline
Reading this chart: The gap between the red line (your profile) and blue line (average US expat) is your personal risk premium — driven by your clearance history, Taiwan ties, and cybersecurity role. The gap widens during stress periods and narrows during de-escalation.
Where you sit on the risk spectrum vs. other Americans in PRC jurisdiction
Risk factors don't just add — they multiply. Each factor independently might be manageable, but the combination creates a profile that's qualitatively different from any single factor alone.

Your composite risk score of 71/100 places you in the top 5% of risk exposure among Americans living in PRC jurisdiction.

This is not paranoia. It's pattern recognition applied to documented precedents. The question isn't whether the risk is real — it's whether the expected value of the life you've built in HK exceeds the probability-weighted cost of the tail scenarios.

Right now, the answer is: yes, but the margin is narrowing. If two or more trigger events fire before September, the math flips.

Reassessment set: September 1, 2026.